Please excuse the hand drawn circuit presentation of schematics and
large file size.
Very Basic Balanced Shunt Feedback
The Balanced Shunt Feedback amp was an idea dreamed up to exploit the
idea of applying balanced loops of shunt NFB from the output stage tube anodes
back to the output of a balanced drive stage using a long tail pair.
The
feedback loops are the shortest loop available as they do not include the
secondary of the output transformer, and avoids some of the instability and
phase shift effects of leakage inductance in the OPT.
To make things
slightly clearer, here is an even more basic simplified schematic circuit
:-
The
problem with anyone wanting to design a shunt FB using NFB between input and
output and to calculate
the effect on distortion and output resistance is to
work out R1 and R2 carefully.
Once that is done, all that is needed to work
out the distortion reduction factor is R1, R2, and output tube gain
for a
given load value. We do not need to know input tube voltage gain.
And the
effective anode resistance after feedback has been added can also be
calculated.
From these figures we can work out whether there enough NFB or
too much.
So let us analyse the above PP amp with 6L6......
The input LTP is arranged using the pentode sections of a pair of 6U8A
triode-pentodes. The triode sections
are configured so they make a high
impedance load on the pentode at signal frequencies, but at low frequencies they
act to supply the required amount of quiescent DC to the pentodes.
The input
impedance to the triodes is high while the output impedance from the triode
cathodes is nearly as low as a cathode follower.
There are feedback
resistors of 470k between the 6L6 output tube anodes and the pentode driver tube
anodes. When these are not connected, the gain of the driver stage is extremely
high because pentode gain is about gm x RL, and the triodes above the pentodes
have an equivalent very high loading dynamic impedance. In the case of the 6U8A
triode section, µ = 40, so the effective impedance looking up into the 22k
cathode resistor = [ ( µ + 1 ) x Rk ] + Ra = ( 41 x 21.2 k ) + 5 k = 874 kOhms.
There is a 1M triode triode grid bias resistor but it is bootstrapped off the
1k2 and 22k triode cathode R network so the 1M is a load which is much higher
than 1M so the triode plus its cathode R act as a dynamic load of approximately
800kOhms.
The feedback resistors between the output tube anodes and the
pentode anodes provide the driver pentodes with their principle loads, equal in
value to 470k divided by the output tube stage ( gain + 1 ).
In this case output tube gain = 80Va / 9.5Vg = 8.42. The voltage at the
pentode anode = 9.8V since it always will be slightly higher than the output
from the triode cathode.
The amp schematic shows that +80V and - 9.8V appear
at each end of the 470k, so the official gain without follower losses
=
80Va / 9.8Va = 8.16, so the effective RL appearing at the pentode anode is
470k / ( 8.16 + 1 ) = 51.3k.
Another way to look at it is to say there is a
total of 89.8Vrms across the 470k, so I = 0.191mA.
If the voltage at the
pentode anode is 9.8Vrms, then its load = Va / IRL = 9.8V / 0.191mA = 51.3k.
However the loading of the triode stage has to be included part of the load
in paralell with the 470k effective load.
The triode loading = 800k, so the
actual load seen by the pentode = 51.3 // 800 = 48.4k.
The gain of the input pentode = µ x RL / ( RL + Ra ) .
It is difficult to
know exactly what the value of µ actually is because it varies because µ = gm x
Ra and both the latter change for a given value of Ia. But we can say that after
perusing the tube data sheets that gm = approx 2.8mA/V and Ra = approx
400k.
So µ = 1,120
So the actual gain of the pentode = 1,120 x 48.4 / (
48.4 + 400 ) = 121.
This is close to the above measurements in the
schematic.
The tetrode output stage gain is approximately inversely proportional to the
RL. If the gain sags as a result of a lower RL then the output anode voltage
will reduce and the effective load seen by the driver pentode stage will
increase in value, since 470 k will be divided by a lower ( gain+1)
total.
The amp has RLa-a = 6k, and if RL = 3k, then the anode signal voltage
would fall from 80V to about 40V for a given
grid input signal so there
would be 49.8V across 470k so the I flow in the 470k = 0.106mA, and the load
appearing
at the pentode = 9.8 / 0.106 = 92.5k.
When this occurs, the
driver stage gain rises because its gain = gm x RL, approximately, and more
drive voltage is automatically applied to the output stage grids via the low
output resistance of the triode's cathode above the pentode drivers. The
output impedance from the cathode of the triode is quite low, and the following
6L6 grid bias resistors have little effect on the pentode driver gain, due to
the buffering effect of the triode.
This is important, since the circuit operation depends on having a highest
possible
output resistance of the driver tube, which is the opposite of most
conventional ideas which say one should only use low mu triodes to drive output
stages. The arrangement of the circuit is negative voltage shunt feedback. To
make the most from the
available NFB the value of R1 must be kept as high as
possible and the value of R2 as low as possible without
causing the driver
tubes to overload.
Beta, ß, the fraction of the output voltage fed
back, is calculated by working out the R1 and R2 resistance arms of the basic
shunt feed arrangement used in all shunt feedback circuits.
The R1 from input
to the grids of the output stage include the effective anode resistance of the
driver pentode in parallel with the triode current source impedance and any
other loads on the pentode except the NFB resistance R2 which is 470k in this
case.
The effective Ra' of the pentode = [ ( µ + 1 ) x Rk ] + Ra = [ ( 1,121
+1 x 2.2k ) + 400k ] = 2.86Mohms.
In this case, R1 is equal to the triode dynamic impedance of 800k // 3.86M =
625k.
Output stage gain = 80Va / 9.5Vg = 8.42
Distortion reduction factor , Drf
=
1
= 0.172
1 + ( 8.42 x 0.57 )
Thus distortion of 3% without any NFB will be reduced to 0.517% with shunt NFB.
An even greater reduction of output resistance/impedance, ie, anode to anode
resistance
of the 6L6 output tubes is available. Without NFB Ra for one 6L6
= approx 35k, and µ = 200 approx.
Ra', after FB, = Ra____
=
35,000 =
304ohms. (This is less than 6L6 strapped as a triode = 1.6k.)
1 + ( µ x ß ) 1 + ( 200 x 0.57 )
Now the OPT impedance ratio is 6 k to 8 ohms, which is 750 to 1, so at the
output we would see the
Rout = ( Ra-a / ZR ) + total P and S winding
resistance for the OPT = ( 2 x 304 / 750 ) + Rw
= 0.81ohms + approx 0.6 =
approx 1.4ohms.
The test amp had its total Rout = approx 1.3 ohms.
From the above calculations, any way we could increase the gain of the output
stage, and increase the value of ß by having R1 as a higher value would improve
the results considerably. In practice, getting B up to about 0.5 is about all we
could manage,
and using higher gain output pentodes, such as EL34 or EL84,
would make the circuit produce better measurements.
Basically the output stage operates as an anode follower. A fuller
explanation of the principle is in the RDH4, pages 332 to 334, although they
don't show the use of the mu-follower circuit anywhere. The circuit also works
well when beam power output tubes are used in UL, but any output stage could be
drafted into this way of applied feedback.
The amount of NFB applied = 20
log ( 1 / Drf ) = is about 15 dB in this circuit. The input pentodes and
driver triodes
can be separate tubes such as 6AU6, 6BX6, 6EJ7 plus 12AT7 or
other suitable triodes. A separate heater supply biased at about 200 v+ for the
follower part of the pentode & triode series arrangement.
To get the best fromj the circuit the OPT should have low winding resistance,
the output stage should work in nearly all class A, and the CT of the OPT should
be provided with a very well smoothed B+ voltage.
Where is any advantage
to using balanced shunt NFB? I just cannot see any for an output stage but
it is an interesting exercize to consider.
Back in 1996 when I dreamed up
this schematic and tried it out on an
old amp chassis it was in response to
Allen Wright's and Joe Rasmussen's
secret ideas of Forced Symmetry which used a combination of balanced shunt
NFB
and balanced series voltage NFB from the OPT anode connections back to
various points of the input/driver stage
which I suspect consisted of a long
tail pair using two arms of j-fets and triodes in cascode which make
the
equivalent of a pentode.
I recall discussing the whole idea of Forced
Symmetry with Joe in the editions of the news letter of the Audiophile
Society
of NSW, A.S.O.N and I wasn't in agreement with Joe at all. The Allen
and Joe empire moved on to other
schemes to make their PP amps palatable to
those who thought single ended amps were the best.
But please try things for yourself before deciding what is best.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Balanced shunt FB for 100W
amp.
I
have not built this amp, and I doubt I ever will because it is too complex. I
publish it here to show
where the idea for balanced shunt FB could be
applied.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Balanced screen FB.
Automatic servo bias control SE amp.
This schematic shows a
basic idea for active servo bias
control for a single output tube.
DC current in the tube generates a voltage at R3.
The signal volages are
filtered out by R5/C2 LPF and the
DC voltage is applied to one the base of
Q1.
The base of Q2 has a reference voltage of about 0.6V
applied from
the voltage divider R8, R8, VR1.
When set up VR1 is adjusted to get the
wanted bias current
in R3 10ohms. Once the DC idle current is set, and
changes to the cathode current in R3 will alter the voltage at R3 and the
Q1 base voltage. If Ik rises, then the voltage at Q1
collector will be
driven more negative thus opposing any rise in cathode voltage. There is enough
differential dc voltage gain in the Q1 / Q2 LTP to keep the idle current in the
tube constant once it is set.
This type of circuit can be developed to be used in a PP
output stage by
having a slightly more elaborate LTP arrangement which i found worked extremely
well to control
the balance of dc current.
Unfortunatly when even a small
amount of global NFB is applied the circuit became unstable at low frequencies
and
I decided the complexity wasn't worth the benefits so this is another
fine idea I have never actually used.
perhaps someone else might get it
working better but I would prefer the simple RC cathode biasing circuit which
regulates
the bias current very adequately in class A amps. Sure there is
some wasted power dissipation in the cathode R
but the simplicity is worth
the wasted heat.
This type of bias control is useless if used for class AB
amps if it is used to try to set the actual bias levels because the cathode
current changes and you don't want the grid bias to change in class AB / B
amps.
But where the LTP is set up to just balance the bias which would
otherwise stay fixed at the adjusted value then the LTP does try to balance the
DC cathode currents. Trouble is when NFB is applied and such circuits become
de-facto phase shift oscillators.
______________________________________________________________________________________________
Error correction in standard class A
Ultralinear 30 watt amplifier.
Considerable
argument errupted at rec.audio.tubes when I published this schematic at
alt.binaries.schematics.electronic.
They all said it was just global NFB being applied in the same old way, but
they are all wrong.
The class A amplifier consits of a standard UL amp with
KT88 (etc) and driven by an LTP. All the ac signal voltages generated
are
shown with 13.7Vrms into 6 ohms at the output giving 31 watts.
The
differential input to V2 & V3 is +3.4Vrms, so the overall voltage gain =
13.7 / 3.4 = 4.029.
The ac voltage shown have their phase polarity shown as +
or - for the instanteneous wave form condition.
The +input voltage is applied directly to the non inverting input port at the
grid of V2.
It is also applied to the input grid of V1.
One would think
that since there is a CCS dc supply to V1 anode, a healthy -voltage would be
generated at the anode.
But V1 is set up so there can be as little as
possible output signal from its anode. There is a 22k resistor, R9 cap
coupled
to the output of the OPT secondary where the speaker connects. The
Volatge at the output is +13.7V~,
so +0.622 mA~ of current flows from the
output to the anode of V1.
The V has the characteristics of µ = 20, Ra = 5k
for the 2 parallel sections, and gm = 4mA/V
So since the anode output voltage
is 0.0V~, there must be a voltage required at Vg-k to generate a current of
-0.622 mA
to oppose the current in R9 so no anode voltage signal
appears.
This Vg-k required = I / gm = 0.622 / 4.0 = 0.155V~.
So where we
have +3.4V~ applied to the grid there must be 3.4V - 0.155V = +3.244V~ at the
cathode, and since the ac Ia = 0.622mA, then Rk must be V / I = 3.244 / 0.622 =
5.21k.
To bias the V1 properly for about 5mA of idle current and have a dc
anode voltage of about +120Vdc,
Rk must be divided into 2 resistors to derive
a biasing voltage of about -Vdc for the grid hence the Rk shown above
is
divided into R6 = 1k and R7 = 4.2k.
Thus far we have calculated the values for the Rk to get zero signal voltage
output from V1 anode.
In practice the R7 value would be adjusted for minimum
signal voltage appearing at V1 anode when the load at the output is about the
middle value of load to be connected, and I have chosen 6 ohms because it is
about 1/2 way between 4 and 8 ohms.
So while there is 0.0V~ appearing at the V1 anode there is also no signal
voltage appearing at V4 grid.
Therefore the 3.4V~ input signal causes the
full output to appear.
The V1 anode output resistance = [ ( µ + 1 ) x Rk ] + Ra = [ ( 20 + 1 ) x
5.2k ] + 5k = 114.2k.
This resistance acts with the 22k R9 to form two arms of a shunt NFB network,
and ß = 114k / ( 22k + 114k ) = 0.84.
If a distortion voltage +Vd~ appears
at the output, then it is divided by V1 Rout and R9 to give +0.84Vd~
at the
anode of v1 and hence is applied to the inverting port of the amp which is the
grid of V3.
It is amplified by the gain of the amp so distortion correction
voltage at the output is 0.84 x 4.029 = -3.38Vd~.
This subtracts from the
distortion voltage of +4.438V~ which is would be present with no error
correction connected
or if one simply grounded V3 grid. The distortion is
thus reduced by a factor of Vd / 4.438Vd = 0.228
which is an applied error
correction of 12.8 dB.
In math terms, the distortion reduction factor = 1 / [ ( 1 + ( A
x ß ) ] where A is the open loop gain without
error correction or NFB
connected.
So in this case Drf = 1 / [1 + ( 4.029 x 0.84 ) ] = 0.228 which is
the same as the ready reckoning we worked through above.
The effect of the error correction network on the output resistance of the
amp is the same as with a loop of NFB.
In this case the Rout without NFB
would be 8 ohms, and the transformed µ' of the output tubes at the output is
approx 0.7,
so Rout' after error cirrection is applied = Rout / [1 + (
A x µ' x ß ) ] where A is the gain of the driver stage.
In this case Rout'
= 8 / [ 1 + ( 16 x 0.7 x 0.84 ) ] = 0.77 ohms. I have neglected winding
resistance of the OPT
and in practice Rout would be about 1 ohm.
So the error correction works to corect distortion and lower output
resistance in exactly the same way as NFB when considering the math of how it
all happens. But there is no feedback signal voltage applied to the amp formed
by
V2, V3, V4 and V5. By no feedback signal I mean a proportion of the
wanted undistorted output signal.
All normal FB amplifiers have a portion of
their output signal ß x Vout fed back and included in this signal
is a
portion of the distortion at the output = Vdn x ß.
In a NFB amp the total applied input signal must be ( Vout / open loop gain )
plus Vout x ß.
If the above amplifier were to be set up as a normal NFB amp
and not use V1 at all then
to get the same distortion reduction factor we
would have to apply 11.5V~ of feedback signal to V3 grid
and 14.9V~ to 2
grid.
Of course in practice this would not be done and V1 would be utilised
as a traditional gain tube ahead
of V2&V3 and so a smaller feedback
voltage and smaller open loop voltage is used since the open loop gain would be
much higher for the amp.
The error correction methode involves less gain
tubes between input and output and employs the error correction amp
as an
additional active amp to provide an error correction voltage to be applied
without any wanted signal voltage to the
main amp. It cannot be any worse
than having the extra gain tube in a conventional tube line up.
The above amp is a bit insensitive with 3.4Vrms needed for full power. But
V2&V3 could be 12AT7,
or a couple of 6BX6 or 6EJ7 strapped as
triodes for some remarkable performance.
V1 could be a variety of triodes
such as 6DJ8, 12AT7 etc.
V1 does not have to ever produce much output signal
voltage and the values of Rk ensure whatever voltage is
produced is at low
thd because of the local current NFB acting with the Rk involved.
Time constants and stability issues may need additional phase shift and gain
tailoring networks to be applied as in a conventional
amp with global
NFB
Perhaps it sounds better with a test signal by Beethoven, but to really find
out, build the circuit.
_______________________________________________________________
Error Correction in fully balanced PP
amp.
This
schematic has a singele ended input converted to two oppositely phased signals
at the anode and cathode outputs
of V1. Signal voltages are shown as +V or -V
to indicate the phases, and instead of having a balanced arangement of the
single V1 in the 30W UL amp above there is an arrangement with the cross
coupled four triodes to two balanced shunt feedback networks shown as R1A &
R2A, and R2B & R2B to give very little signal output voltage at the resistor
junctions.
At the junctions there is only the correction voltage, ie, ß x
Vout where Vout is the anode signal at each side of the output PP
circuit.
The schematic is a challenge for anyone to build, as well as to
understand. Rather than say exactly how this works and
put everyone to
sleep, I leave it to the few wide awake mortals with enquiring minds to work it
all out like I did.
There are many circuits for amplifiers
which could be employed but nearly all those like this last one are more
difficult to understand and are more complex and have a few more triodes, R and
C components than simpler circuit topologies which
have already been proven
to work flawlessy. So thus it would be difficult to justify the extra complexity
and the cost.
Some makers such as McIntosh and ARC do have more complexity in
their circuits than I would care to use.
These makers with very long
established reputations are under no threat from minor designers like myself who
would challenge the validity of complexity where I see no need for it; I achieve
splendid subjective fidelity and quite good enough
thd/imd
measurements.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Please
excuse the copy of the handwritten work book page I did back in about 2004 when
I measured the THD for
a line stage. The conclusions were:-
All triode
types and configurations were acceptable.
6CG7 had less THD than the present
fashionable flavour tube, the
6H30.
And BTW, my client thought the 6CG7
sounded better. I like
6CG7.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
More
simple preamps
Here
are a couple of simple line stages. Both 1 and 2 are inverting amplifiers, ie,
the phase of the output is 180degrees
to the input. Thousands of
preamps have been made with the above
recipes.

3
more line stages for examination. No3 is inverting, but types 4 and 5 are non
inverting.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

This inverting SET preamp has constant
current sources for the dc supply to both gain triode and cathode
follower.
There is also shunt NFB around the input gain stage to reduce its
gain from being too high.
The gain stage can be switched out of the
circuit when no gain is needed.
12AU7, 6DJ8, 6SN7 are all other suitable twin
triodes.
______________________________________________________________________________________________