Let us examine the output transformer No1 which was given as an a
recipe
for a good design for a push pull amp of approximately 60 watts in my
page
on 'Output Transformer Theory'.
First I will display the schematic of OPT No1 :-
Fig1
In the older 2002 edition of my website I list steps 1 to 10 to
design
OPT No1. The method was rather vague
and in February 2005 I rationalised the design process
to take all that RDH4 says about OPT design, plus create
a design flow that lists each step actually required to get to a
working design that any transformer winder can actually
use in his workshop without any further calculations to produce an OPT.
The main differences between the 2002 method and the 2006 method is
that winding resistance losses are
factored in early after calculating the primary turns. The
primary winding fill factor of the actual core window size is
limited to to 0.28 x S x T which appears to work with most OPTs.
Until May 2006, I have not seen any computer program which achieves
what
I attempt to achieve by following logic steps and using one's brain,
some intuitive imagination and
a pocket calculator with easy equations.
The design logic flow could be used to construct a computer program
where
one would enter the design requirements such as power, secondary load,
tube Ra, core dimensions, then with a click on a "design" button,
out would come a terrific
design including all the exact wire sizes and a cross sectional drawing
of the bobbin windup details that could be understood easily by
anyone with some winding experience.
Alas, I am not a computer expert, but i can give you the flow of logic
used to get a design finalised.
I invite anyone interested to
prepare a PC program to encompass all the horrible fiddly
details of
fitting the wire
that is available from the suppliers
into the cores available for superb
OPTs.
OUTPUT TRANSFORMER No1 DESIGN EXAMPLE
FOR 60 WATT PP OPT for 5,000 to 6
ohms.
1. Choose tubes,
operating conditions and primary
load for the tubes applied across the
full primary, known as the anode to anode load, PRL, ohms.
**Note. Careful loadline analysis is
required for accurate loading and
is
not in this list of steps.
OPT1, One pair of 6550, UL AB1,
Ea = 520V, Ia q = 60mA approx,
so allow for RL = 5ka-a...........................................................................5,000ohms
2. Choose the
secondary nominal speaker load value.
allow a default value of 5 ohms,
SRL, ohms.
OPT1.....................................................................................................5ohms
3. Choose the
maximum power at clipping for the
PRL chosen above. Max PO for any
class of operation, A1, AB1,
AB2, watts
**Note. The anode to anode voltage swings can be read off the PP
load line
analysis, and PO = ( Vrms anode to
anode ) squared / RL
OPT1. PO =
60w.....................................................................................60w
4. Calculate the minimum required
core centre leg cross sectional area, Afe,
for a nearly square core cross section.
Afe = 300 x
sq.rtPO sq.mm
**Note. This formula
has
been derived from a basic formula
for
core size used for mains transformers, Afe = sq.root power input / 4.4
where the Afe is in sq inches. This ancient formula is based on B being
about
1 Tesla at 50Hz but we would want B max < approx 0.5 Tesla for an
OPT.
After considerable trials the above formula is a good guide for audio
OPT.
OPT1, Afe = 300 x sq.rt 60 = 300 x 7.75 = 2,323
sq.mm........................2,323sq.mm
5. Calculate
the core tongue dimension, T.
For a square core section, tongue dimension = stack height, ie T = S.
T x S = Afe, sq.mm
Therefore theoretical T dimension =
sq.rt AFe = th T, mm
eg, thT = sq.rt 2,323 = 48.2
mm............................................................48.2mm
Choose suitable standard T size from list of available wasteless
E&I lamination core materials.
T sizes commonly available for OPTs :-
20mm, 25mm, 32mm, 38mm, 44mm, 51mm, 63.5mm
**Note. Choosing a
standard T size above thT gives lower copper winding
losses, higher weight,
and choosing T below thT gives higher losses and lower
weight. Afe will be the same for
either 44mm
or 51mm chosen from above so the LF response won't change with tongue
size. HF peformance
depends entirely upon the interleaving geometry and insulations.
OPT1 choose core T =
44mm..................................................................44mm
6. Calculate
theoretical stack height, thS using the chosen T
size.
thS = Afe / T, then adjust to a larger height to suit nearest standard
plastic bobbin size if
available, mm.
OPT1, S = 2,323 / 44 = 52.7mm, but choose
51mm........................................................51mm
7.
Adjusted Afe = chosen T x chosen
S, sq.mm
OPT1, Adjusted Afe = 44 x 51 =
2,244sq.mm.................................................................2,244sq.mm
**Note. Some constructors will
be using non wasteless E&I lams,
or
C cores which do not have the same relative dimensions as E&I
Wasteless Pattern cores.
The actual sizes of the T, S, H, & L of the core to be used
must be confirmed.
8. Confirm the
height of the winding window,
H, mm.
OPT1, 44T wasteless material has H =
22...........................................................................22mm
9. Confirm the
length of the winding widow,
L, mm.
OPT1, Wasteless material has L =
66mm............................................................................66mm
10. Calculate
the theoretical primary winding turns, thNp
Np = sq.rt( PRL x PO) x 10,000 /
Afe = thNp, no
of turns.
**Note.
The formula here is
derived from more complex and complete formula taking B and F
into account. If we assume magnetic field strength B = 1.6 Tesla, and F
= 14 Hz, which is a
suitably
low F for where saturation is commencing, and express V in terms of
load and power,
we get the above short easy equation for primary turns required.
The full formula for calculating B is in step 40 below. The V factor
can be expressed as
sq.root of ( Primary RL x power output ) as in the above simplified
equation.
OPT1, RL = 5,000 ohms, PO = 60w,
Afe = 2,244sq.mm from above,
thNp = sq.rt ( 5,000 x 60 ) x 10,000 / 2,244 = 2,440
turns..............................2,440 turns
11. Calculate
theoretical Primary wire dia, thPdia.
**Note 4. The Primary wire used
for the transformer will occupy a
portion
of the window area = 0.28 x L x
H. The constant of 0.28 works for 99% of OPT.
Each turn of wire will occupy an area = oa dia squared.
Overlall or oa dia is the dia including enamel insulation.
Therefore theoretical over all dia of
P wire including enamel
insulation
= sq.rt ( 0.28 x L x H / Np
),
mm.
OPT1, thoadia P wire = sq.rt ( 0.28 x 66 x 22 / 2,440 )
= sq.rt 0.167
= 0.4082
mm...............................................................................0.4082mm
12. Find nearest
suitable oa wire size from the
tables, oaPdia, mm
OPT1, try oa wire size = 0.414mm, ( for Cudia = 0.355 mm.
)..............................0.414mm
13. Establish
the
bobbin winding traverse
width, Bww, in mm.
**Note 5. Bobbin traverse
width is the distance between the cheek
flanges and varies depending
on who made the bobbin, but each flange thickness = 2mm maximum is
common but could be less.
Where bobbin flanges are not used, and insulation is simply extended to
the
full window length L,
the traverse width will be the same as in the case of of where bobbin does have flanges.
Ie, the winding will
traverse a distance = L - 4mm.
OPT1, Bww = 66 - 4 = 62
mm...........................................................................62mm
14. Calculate no of
theoretical P turns per layer,
thPtpl, turns.
thPtpl = 0.97 x Bww / oa dia from step
12.
**Note. The constant 0.97
factor allows for imperfect layer
filling.
Leave out fractions of a turn.
OPT1, thPtpl = 0.97 x 62 / 0.414 =
145.26.........................................................145
turns
15. Calculate
theoretical number of primary layers, thNpl,
then round down or up to convenient even
number of layers.
Theoretical Npl = thNp / Ptpl,
then round
up/down.
OPT1, thNpl = 2,440 / 145 = 16.68 layers; round down to
16................................16 layers
**Note. Rounding down may
reduce the Npl needed for Fs = 14 Hz.
But the actual turns used will still allow Fs = approximately 15 Hz,
which is ok.
For those wanting to maintain Fs, or have Fs marginally lower than 14
Hz,
the Afe can be increased by increasing S from say 51 mm to 62 mm, and
still use a standard
sized bobbin, and have Fs at 12Hz.
The calculated no of primary layers should be an even number to avoid a
CT in the middle of a layer,
and because each 1/2 primary winding must have an equal number of turns
and a symetrical geometric layout
either side of the CT.
16. Calculate actual
Np.
Np = P layers x thPtpl
OPT1, Np = 16 x 145 = 2,320
turns...............................................................2,320
turns
17. Calculate
average turn length, TL
TL = ( 3.14 x H ) + ( 2 x
S ) + ( 2 x T ), mm.
OPT1, TL = ( 3.14 x 22 ) + ( 2 x 51 ) + ( 2 x 44 ) = 259
mm............................259mm
18. Calculate
primary winding resistance, Rwp.
Rwp = ( Np x TL ) / ( 44,000 x Pdia x
Pdia ), ohms.
where 44,000 is a constant, and P dia is the copper dia from the wire
tables.
OPT1, Rwp = 2,320 x 267 / ( 44,000 x 0.355 x 0.355 ) = 111.7
ohms................112ohms
19. Calculate
primary winding loss %,
P loss % = 100 x Rwp / ( PRL + Rwp ),
%.
OPT1 P loss = 100 x 112 / ( 5,000 + 112 ) =
2.19%..............................................2.19%
20. Is the
winding loss more than 2.5%?
..................................................yes or no.
If yes, the design calcs must be checked again, if no, proceed to 21.
OPT1, P winding loss is less than 2.5%.
**Note. If the P
winding losses are less than 2%, there is a
possibility that the wire size could be reduced
to increase the turns per layer, and possibly reduce the number of P
layers by say 2.
However I rarely find P winding losses will be less than 2% with the
rated load, and one must allow for
where RL = 1/2 the design RL which will double P winding losses.
21. Choose the
interleaving pattern from the list below for
the wattage of the transformer.
All
OPT will have the secondary
sections containing only one layer of wire.
While this may be subdivided into further secondary sub sections, there
are no designs here which require
bifilar or trifilar winding or rectangular wire.
A
section of a winding is defined as a layer or group of layers devoted
solely to P or S.
The term "section" is not to be confused with "layer". For tube
OPT, most P sections will have
more than one layer of wire.
In general, all OPT should comply
with the following P&S layer number relationships :-
Where the first
and last winding on is a primary section, then these sections should
have near 1/2 the layers of the inner sections, hence
if there are 3 outer p layers in a P section, the inner sections might
be either 5, 6 or 7 p layers. When this
guide is adhered to there is the best HF response because the leakage
inductance is fairly evenly and
symetrically distributed.
When starting and finishing with
an S section all internal P sections
should have the same number of p layers
but it is not always possible and having say 2 sections of 4 p layers
and 2 sections of 5 p layers is OK.
The size of such "internal sections" should not vary more than 25%.
Where such guidelines are adhered to along
with equal thickness insulations between P and S sections, there are
minimal problems with resonances at HF.
For transformers to suit low
drive devices such as mosfets or transistors, the same amount of
interleaving is required for a
a given power level. The number of p layers will be reduced as Primary
RL becomes low, and wire dia will increase.
An 8 ohm : 8 ohm OPT with very low dc voltage differences between P and
S would have equal numbers of turns for P and S and perhaps be simply
interleaved so each layer of thick wire is alternatively devoted to
either P or S.
The bandwidth can then be very easily made to go up
to 500kHz. As the primary or secondary load is reduced, the effect of
shunt capacitance diminishes, so insulation thickness can be reduced.
Transformers for
electrostatic speakers which step up the
amplifier voltage between 50 and 100 times need to have good insulation
for voltages involved and need to have lower capacitance. They resemble
PP OPTs powered "backwards" and can be designed with the
method here.
But for matching tubes to normal
3 to 9 ohm speaker
loads, the interleaving list below with the number of primary layers
per section possible will give at
least 70 kHz of bandwidth, and where there is a highest number of
interleavings the bandwidth
can be 300kHz. Using more interleaving than listed leads to less
available room on the bobbin for wire due to too many layers of
insulation, and poor HF due to high shunt capacitances, and higher
winding
losses.
For lower Primary RL and higher amplifier power the larger the OPT
becomes and for a given number of interleavings the
HF response becomes less due to increasing leakage inductance so the
larger the OPT becomes, the number of interleaved sections increases.
So a small 15 watt OPT may only need
3S + 2P sections for 70kHz, but a 500 watt OPT may need 6S + 6P
sections.
LIST
OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WINDING SEQUENCE ON THE BOBBIN :-
Up
to 15W, 10 to 20 p
layers.....S - 5p to 10p - S - 5p to 10p -
S
3S + 2P sections
2p to 4p - S - 4p to 8p - S - 4p to 8p -
S -
2p to 4p 3S + 4P
15W to 35W, 12 p layers
.........2p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S -
2p
3S + 4P
S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p -
S
4S + 3P
16 p layers..........3p - S - 5p - S - 5p - S -
3p
3S + 4P
S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S
- 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
18 p layers..........3p - S - 6p - S - 6p - S -
3p
3S + 4P
20 p layers.........3p - S - 7p - S - 7p - S -
3p
4S + 3P
S - 5p
- S - 5p - S - 5p - S - 5p - S
5S + 4P
2p - S
- 5p - S - 6p - S - 5p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
35W
to 120W, 14 p layers...........S
- 3p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 3p -
S
5S +
4P
2p - S - 3p - S - 4p - S - 3p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
16 p layers............S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
18 p layers............S - 4p
- S - 5p - S - 5p - S - 4p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S - 5p - S - 4p - S - 5p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
20 p layers............S - 5p
- S - 5p - S - 5p - S - 5p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S - 5p - S - 6p - S - 5p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
22 p layers............S - 5p
- S - 6p - S - 6p - S - 5p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S - 6p - S - 6p - S - 6p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
120W to 500W, 10 p
layers.........2p - S
- 2p - S - 2p - S - 2p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
S - 2p - S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 2p -
S
5S + 4P
1p - S - 2p - S - 2p - S - 2p - S - 2p -
S - 1p
5S + 6P
S - 2p - S - 2p - S - 2p - S - 2p -
S - 2p - S
6S + 5P
12 p layers...........2p - S - 3p - S - 2p - S - 3p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
S
- 3p - S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 3p -
S
5S + 4P
1p -
S - 2p - S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 2p - S - 1p
5S + 6P
S - 2p - S - 3p - S - 2p - S - 3p -
S - 2p -
S
6S + 5P
S - 2p - S - 2p - S - 4p - S - 2p - S -
2p - S
6S + 5P
14 p layers..........2p - S
- 3p - S - 4p - S - 3p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
S
- 3p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 3p -
S
5S + 4P
1p - S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 3p -
S - 1p
5S + 6P
S - 2p - S - 3p - S - 4p - S - 3p -
S - 2p - S
6S + 5P
16 p layers............2p -
S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
S
- 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S
- 3p - S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 2p
5S + 6P
S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 4p - S - 3p -
S - 3p - S
6S + 5P
18 p layers............2p - S
- 5p - S - 4p - S - 5p - S -
2p
4S + 5P
S
- 5p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 5p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S
- 4p - S - 3p - S - 3p - S - 4p - S - 2p
5S + 6P
S - 3p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p -
S - 3p - S
6S + 5P
20 p layers............3p - S - 5p - S - 4p - S - 5p - S -
3p
4S + 5P
S
- 5p - S - 5p - S - 5p - S - 5p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S
- 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 2p
5S + 6P
S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 4p -
S - 4p -
S
6S + 5P
22 p layers.............3p - S - 5p - S - 6p - S - 5p - S -
3p
4S + 5P
S
- 5p - S - 6p - S - 6p - S - 5p -
S
5S + 4P
2p - S
- 5p - S - 4p - S - 4p - S - 5p - S - 2p
5S + 6P
S - 4p - S - 6p - S - 4p - S - 6p -
S - 4p -
S
6S + 5P
Record the choice of primary layers in
step 15.
choose a suitable P& S interleaving pattern from the above list.
OPT1, 16 primary layers, 60 watts, choose
...............................................................4S
+ 5P.
22. Choose
insulation, i, in
mm used between primary layers,
mm.
**Note. Usually p to p
insulation for all OPT needs to only be
0.05mm thick.
OPT1, i =
0.05mm....................................................................................................0.05mm
23. Choose
insulation, I, in
mm used between Primary and Secondary layers,
mm.
**Note. Usually,
for where Ea is above 450V, and
RL above 1k, the p to S
insulation is first reckoned = 0.6mm to keep shunt capacitance low with
good enough
insulation.
OPT1, I = 0.6 mm
...................................................................................................0.6mm
24. Calculate
portion of bobbin winding height comprising primary
wire layers, p to p insulation,
and p to S insulation.
height of P+I+i = ( no of layers x
oadia P wire ) + ( no x i ) + ( no x
I ), mm.
OPT1, P = 16 x 0.414 = 6.624 mm,
i ht = 11 x 0.05 = 0.55
mm,
I ht = 8 x 0.6 =
4.8 mm,
Total ht of above = 11.974
mm............................................................................11.98mm
25. Calculate
maximum total available height of all windings on bobbin.
Max wind ht = 0.8 x
H, mm.
**Note. The
constant of 0.8 will suit most OPT.
OPT1, Wht = 0.8 x 22 = 17.6
mm...................................................................................17.6mm
26. Calculate
the max theoretical oa dia of the the
secondary wire
in secondary layers, thSoadia.
max thSoadia = ( max wind ht - [
P+i+I ht ] ) / no of S
layers, mm
**Note. The available height for
secondary layers = maximum bobbin winding height - (
primary + all
insulations ).
OPT1, We have chosen 4 layers of secondary wires. Height from step
24
= 11.98mm
thSoadia = ( 17.6 - 11.98 ) / 4 = 5.62 / 4 = 1.405
mm..............................................1.406mm
27. Find
nearest oa dia wire size less than thSoadia calculated
in step 26.
OPT1, Try 1.351mm oa dia, which is 1.25 mm Cu dia
...............................................1.351mm
28.
Calculate the theoretical S turns per layer, to nearest
turn, thStpl.
Get the Bobbin winding width from step 13, Bww.
Theoretical S
turns per layer,
thStpl = Bww /
thSoadia from step 27
OPT1, thStpl = 62 / 1.351 = 45.89, choose
45...........................................................45 turns
per layer
**Note.
The calculated turns per layer are for the thickest wire possible but
could be more turns of a smaller dia
to obtain the wanted turn ratios to to give the wanted load matches.
No
less than 45 turns per S layer can be used if the traverse width is
kept full because the increase in wire size will give a total height of
the
winding which exceeds the allowable total winding height.
29.
Calculate the nearest full S turns needed for loads of 3.5 ohms, 5 ohms
and 7 ohms.
Secondary turns = primary turns /
square root of impedance ratio.
OPT3, 2,320 P turns. PRL = 3.1k ,
for 3.5 ohms want 61 turns,
for 5.0 ohms want 73 turns,
for 7.0 ohms want 87 turns.
30. Choose a
pattern of Secondary winding sections from Fig 2, 3, 4, 5 below to
possibly give
a suitable variety
of at least two secondary load matches of between 3 and 9 ohms to suit
most modern speakers
while the Primary load is considered
to be 5,000 ohms.
OPT1, From step 15 we caculated 16 primary layers.
In the P&S winding list in step 21 we selected the 5S + 5P winding
pattern.
See Fig3 below.
Reading the charts below could be
confusing!!!
Each rectangle represents a given separate OPT . The figure of N and
its multiples are shown to give the
relationship between numbers of turns in each winding shown as a thick
line.
Consider example 2A in Fig2..
There are two layers, each divided into 2N and N turns, which means
there could be 50 and 25 turns respectively.
Where it says "3 @ 2N" means there are 3 parallel windings of 2N turns
each
In the case of 2A, it means there are in fact 2 windings of 2N each and
the third is made up of N+N in series.
Ns, or the secondary turn number for the transformer = 2N turns, since
paralleling any number of same turn windings
does not alter Ns .
"2 @ 3N consists of two parallel windings each consisting of 2N + N
turns in series.
In the case of all transformers the first line of impedance loads are
listed for a given number
of N as "Z = 1.0 1.7 3.0 5.0"
, and the figures are starting reference impedances for each
transformer.
The next line below for an increased number of N give the relative
values of Z for that number of N
and the vertical columns of Z values give the relative impedance
relationships for the various numbers of N
in windings.
So reading 2A, if we have 1.0 ohms as the match possible for 2N turns,
then for 3N turns
the match is for 2.3 ohms, and for 6N turns the match is to 9 ohms.
There could also be a match where 2N = 3.0 ohms, and reading down the
figures 3N gives 6.8 ohms, 6N gives 27 ohms.
In 2B, there is 4 @ 1N, Z = 1.0, etc, but the figure of N for 2A and 2B have no
relationship.
I hope I have made it easy for everyone to get easy valuable
winding information.
Fig
2. Fig 3. Fig 4. Fig 5.




Each rectangle represents the secondaries in a given OPT. There is no
need to include the primary layers because
the number of primary layers could vary hugely without any change to
the secondary layout ans sub section divisions.
The secondaries are always going to have turns appropriate to
relatively low loads in the majority of OPT.
For the OPT No1 example we have chosen to use 4S + 5P so we can
trial the secondary subsections
from any of the 3 examples of 4A, 4B, or 4C shown in the above Fig
3. We have already calculated in step 28
that we could possibly have
45 turns per layer.
Compare all available arrangements of secondary sub-sections and decide
which arrangement offers the most useful
range of load matches.
OPT1, Examine 4A from Fig3.
There is a total of 6 windings with the numerical relationships of 3
windings of N turns, and 4 windings of 3N turns.
So we can have the top S layer divided into 3 windings of 15 turns each
and 3 other layers of 45 turns each.
This allows the connection of
windings to be as follows :-
4 parallel windings of 45 turns as
calculated in step 29.........................................1.88
ohms
3 parallel windings of 60 turns consisting of 45 + 15 turns
each............................3.34 ohms
2 parallel windings of 90 turns each consisting of 2 x 45 turns
in series.................7.52 ohms
4 series windings of 45 turns each = 180turns
.....................................................30.1 ohms
The above selection has two load
matches between 3 ohms and 9 ohms.
**Note.
The calculated number of turns per layer of 45 just happens to
be exactly divisible by 3.
If the layer was not exactly divisible, say it was 41, 44, 46, or 47
turns, we would be forced to adjust the turns
to the next highest number of turns
divisible by 3, and revise our load match calculations.
Examine 4B.
There is a total of 8 windings, 4 @ 4N, 4 @ 1N.
So we could have 4 @ 36 turns and 4 @ 9
turns.
This allows the connection of windings to
be as follows :-
5 parallel windings of 36 turns
each.....................................................................1.20
ohms
4 parallel windings of 45 turns as
calculated in step 29.........................................1.88
ohms
2 parallel windings of 90 turns each consisting of 2 x 45 turns
in series.................7.52 ohms
4 series windings of 45 turns each = 180turns
.....................................................30.1 ohms
Only
one load load match that is suitable.
Examine 4C.
There is a total of 8 windings, 4 @ 2N, 4 @ 1N.
So we could have 4 @ 45 turns and 4 @ 15 turns.
This allows the connection of windings to
be as follows :-
6 parallel windings of 30 turns
each.....................................................................0.84
ohms
4 parallel windings of 45 turns as
calculated in step 29.........................................1.88
ohms
3 parallel windings of 60 turns consisting of 45 + 15 turns
each............................3.34 ohms
2 parallel windings of 90 turns each consisting of 2 x 45 turns
in series.................7.52 ohms
4 series windings of 45 turns each = 180turns
.....................................................30.1 ohms
Choose between available options.
4A and 4C give 2 load matches between 3 and 9 ohms and thus either
could be used.
4B only gives one load match within 3 and 9 ohms and cannot be chosen.
**Note.
4C has a match to 0.84 ohms not available in 4A, but this is
unlikely to ever be used.
4A would be easier to wind, another reason to select 4A.
**Note.
When 4A is selected, the number of secondary turns per layer could be
increased to possibly keep within
the
limits for wanted low winding losses.
48 turns give 2.1 ohms, 3.8 ohms and 8.6 ohms. OK, two
matches between 3 and 9 ohms.
51 turns give 2.4 ohms, 4.3 ohms and 9.64 ohms, NOT OK , only one match
between 3 and 9 ohms.
57 turns give 3.0 ohms, 5.4 ohms and 12.0 ohms, OK, two matches between
3 and 9 ohms.
60 turns give 3.4 ohms, 5.9 ohms and 13.4 ohms, OK, two matches between
3 and 9 ohms.
Choose final option to suit nominal 4
ohms and 8 ohm speakers which can often have average Z =3 or 6 ohms.
**Note. All turns per layer which
are more the calculated minimum tpl
will have higher winding losses.
The 4A secondary pattern with 57 turns
per layer seems suitable, but the 1.0mm wire will be a tight squeeze to
get 57 turns between the cheeks.
31.
Confirm the turn selection step 30 with regard to actual available wire
size.
Theoretical oa wire dia = bobbin winding width / S turns per
layer.
Select wire from tables, Cu wire
dia, mm
OPT1, oa wire dia = 62mm / 57 = 1.088 mm,
so from wire tables select 1.00mm wire
because oa dia = 1.093 approx.
57 turns occupies 62.3 mm but we would fit the turns if the entry/exit
of wire ends is staggered slightly
on each side of the bobbin.
Cu dia
...........................................................................................................................1.0mm
32.
Calculate chosen secondary option winding resistance.
List the following :-
Primary turns chosen for
Ns, no.
S wire Cu dia for chosen tpl, from wire
tables, mm.
Turn length is from
step
17, mm.
No of parallel sections from option chosen to make up Ns
turns, no.
ZR for chosen S turns, no.
S winding resistance
= Ns x TL / ( No of parallel S
sections x 44,000 x
wire dia x wire dia ), ohms.
OPT1, Consider 57 turns per layer, arranged for 3 parallel windings
of ( 57 + 19 ) turns each.
Ns
.......................................................................................................................76
Eg, wire Cu dia
mm...............................................................................................1.0
TL from step 17,
mm.............................................................................................267
No parallel S sections,
no.......................................................................................3
ZR = 2,320 / 76 squared =
932:1...........................................................................932
Swr = 76 x 259 / ( 3 x 44,000 x 1.0 x 1.0 ) = 0.149
ohms......................................0.149 ohms.
33. Calculate S loss
% for chosen option for chosen Ns turns
Nominate the
SRL, ohms.
SRL = PRL / ZR from step 32.
OPT1, SRL = 5,000 / 932 = 5.4
ohms..................................................................5.4
ohms
S loss % = 100 x Swr / ( SRL + Swr ),
%.
OPT1 S loss = 100 x 0.149 / ( 0.149 + 5.4 ) = 2.69%..............................................2.69%
**Note. If the option
where 45 turns per secondary layer was chosen the wire size is 1.25mm
dia
and the secondary winding losses would be lower at 2.4%.
34.
Calculate total winding losses, chosen option,
Total winding loss % = P loss + S
loss.....................................................ttl
loss, %
P loss from step19,
%
S loss from step 33,
%
OPT1, P loss from step 19,
%........................................................................2.19%
S loss from step 33, %
..................................................................................2.69%
Total loss = 2.19 + 2.69 =
4.96%...................................................................4.88%
35. Are total
winding losses
acceptable?............................................................yes/no
OPT1,
yes,.......................................................................................................yes.
36. If yes to step
35, proceed
to check if the winding height really is practical.
37.
Check the
final winding height and bobbin thickness to make sure OPT1, Total winding height including bobbin bass = 18.96. Remaining clearance = window height of 22mm - 18.96mm = 3.04mm = OK
the completed wound bobbin will fit into the core window.
Primary layers, 16 x 0.414mm = 6.624mm.
Insulation, p to p layers, 4 x 3 x 0.05mm = 0.6mm.
Secondary layers, 4 x 1.09mm = 4.36 mm.
Insulation P to S layers, 8 x 0.6mm = 4.8mm.
Insulation over top of last on primary, 0.6mm.
Bobbin bass thickness, 2mm.
38. Calculate
leakage
inductance, where is is considered to be
an equivalent quantity of inductance in series with the primary load
looking into one end of the primary, with the other end grounded.
LL = 0.417 x Np
squared x TL x { ( 2 x n x c )
+ a }
1,000,000,000 x n squared x b
Where LL = leakage inductance, in Henrys,
0.417 is a constant for all equations to work,
Np = primary turns,
TL = average turn length around bobbin,
2 is a constant, since there is an area at each end of a layer where
leakage occurs,
n = number of dielectrics, ie, the junctions between layers of P and S
windings,
c = the dielectric gap, ie, the distance between the copper wire
surfaces in P and S windings,
a = height of the finished winding in the bobbin,
b = the traverse width of the winding across the bobbin.
Distances are all in mm!
OPT1,
LL =
0.417 x 2,320 x 2,320 x 267 {
( 2 x 8 x 0.7 ) + 17.7 }
1,000,000,000 x 8 x 8 x 62
=
0.00435 Henry = 4.35 mH.
39. Is
the leakage
inductance low enough?
Calculate reactance of LL at 100 kHz.
ZLL at 100kHz = L in henrys x 2 x pye
x F
= L x 6.28 x 100,000Hz, ohms
OPT1,
ZLL at 100kHz = 0.00435 x 6.28 x 100,000 = 2,731 ohms
.................2,731 ohms
Is ZLL less than PRL at 100
kHz?.............................................................yes/no
Eg, we have RL = 5,000 ohms, ZLL = 2,731 ohms at 100
kHz...................yes.
40. If answer to
step 38 is yes, leakage inductance is low enough.
41. Check that
calculation of primary turns gives less than 1.6 Tesla magnetic field
strength, B,
at full power and at 14 Hz.
B = 22.6 x V x
10,000
S x T x Np x F
where B is in Tesla,
22.6 and 10,000 are constants for all transformer equations,
V = Vrms signal voltage across the primary, or sq.rt ( PO x PRL )
S = core stack height,
T = core tongue width,
Np = primary turns,
F = frequency at which B is to be measured.
All dimensions in mm!!
Eg, for 60 watts into 5k, Va-a = 547vrms.
B at 14Hz = 22.6 x 547 x
10,000 = 1.57 Tesla = OK **Note. The above wind
up is for plain UL. If CFB windings are used, there will need to be
some increase in **Note. There is some room
for bulge in the windings as they are wound on.
55 x 44 x 2,320 x 14
some of the primary to primary insulations because the CFB windings
will be at 0V potential.
so instead of at least 2 x 0.05mm p-p insulation layers there may be
extra 2 x 0.6mm.
Wire will not lay tightly as layers are put on and will tend to spring
up across the rectangular core.
The bulge will distribute itself from start to finish and wires will
not be naturally tight in the vertical direction
hence the importance of impregnation with varnish to make windings
adhere to each other.
43. If yes to step
42, Design is OK and sourcing materials can be undertaken.
44. Are the
wire sizes available?
.......................................................yes/no
45. If
no to step 42, find out what sizes are
available, and design to suit
these sizes without compromises!!!
46. Draw up the bobbin
winding details for the proposed OPT No 1 ready for
the
guy who is going to wind the OPT.
Fig 6.

47. Shunt capacitance of an
OPT.
There are several areas in an audio transformer where capacitance
exists, and with an OPT we are primarily interested
in the total measured capacitances when we measure the capacitance at
the anode terminals of the OPT.
There is capacitance between primary wires in the form of the "self
capacitance" of the primary layers of wire
and between layers of wire adjacent to secondary sections which
have much lower signal voltages
and are effectively at 0V potential.
To calculate the primary shunt capacitance in an audio transformer
such as OPT No1, refer to the above bobbin winding
layout. Neglect the self capacitance of the primary windings; it will
be such a small amount compared to the
main shunt C between adjacent P to S interfaces.
The distance between the copper surfaces of primary and secondary
layers including the insulation thickness
of 0.6mm and the wire enamel of about 0.05mm = approx 0.7mm.
Then you must allow for the curved surface of the wire turns so total
distance = approx 0.75mm.
Capacitance
between two metal plates
= ( A x K ) / (
113.1 x d )
where
Capacitance is in pF,
A is the area in square millimetres of the plates assumed to be of
equal size,
K is the dielectric constant of the material between the plates, air
being = 1.0,
113.1 is a constant for all equations to work,
d is the distance in millimetres between the plates and is the same for
the area of the plates.
For example, if the turn length around the wound bobbin nearest
'anode 1' = 250mm, and winding traverse width
= 62mm, then area = 250 x 62 = 15,500 sq.mm.
Let us say the K for the polyester = 2.
( The C can be measured if unknown using metal plates of known area,
and
using a sample of polyester
clamped tight between the plates for the whole area. Once the C
measurement has been recorded,
the plates are set up with a very small width strips
of polyester leaving the plates the same distance apart
but with mostly air between the plates, and the C measured again.
K = C measured with full amount of polyester / C measured with just
air.
)
The d we calculated above = 0.75mm.
C in pF = 15,500 x 2 / ( 113.1 x 0.75 ) = 365.5pF.
The amount of capacitance in each P to S interface varies with turn
length so that nearest 'anode 2'
the C would be less.
But for a simple estimate of the C at each P to S interface we could
say C simply = 360pF.
The first P-S interface down from 'anode 1', or the top of the
wind-up at above the GH-IJ-KL
is at a position of 6.5 layers / 8 layers along the P winding from the
CT where the signal voltage is zero.
This positioning results in the capacitance being subject to the
impedance ratio at this position.
Therefore the C is transformed to 360pF x (6.5 / 8) squared, = 360 x 0.66 = 237pF.
The next area of 360pF down from anode 1 appears below the sec layer
GH-IJ-KL and the impedance ratio
is (5.5 / 8) squared = 0.47 so the C due to this interface at anode 1 =
360pF x 0.47 = 170pF.
Next down the Z ratio is above the EF sec and = (2.5 / 8) squared =
0.098, so C = 35pF at anode 1,
then below EF the Z ratio reduces the 360pF by (1.5 / 8) squared = 13pF.
The total C appearing at the anode 1 connection is the sum of all these
transformed capacitances =
237pF + 170pF + 35pF + 13pF = 455pF, which is approximately
what we would measure with a capacitance
meter connected to anode 1 with CT grounded and one end of all the
secondary layers all grounded.
If the OPT No1 bobbin was used for an SE amplifier design the
capacitance would be calculated similarly
but have a total of many more calculated values of effective
capacitances seen at the ONE end of the P winding.
Cathode Feedback use further complicates the capacitance calculation
but the effect of the capacitance
on amplifier bandwidth is effectively reduced by the NFB because the
NFB reduces the Ra of the
tubes.
If the above transformer No1 is used with a pair of KT88 in beam
tetrode mode then if
the Ra is simply about 18,000 ohms at each anode and without a load the
gain of the tube will reduce
-3dB from approximately being equal to µ of the tube at say 500Hz
at where the
capacitive reactance = Ra. Since C = approx 445pF, then this -3dB pole
is found easily at a frequency = 159,000 / ( Ra x C in uF) = 159,000 /
( 18,000 x 0.000445 ) = 19.8kHz.
In practice this would be about correct, and one way to measure the C
shunt with a tube
is to use a high Ra tube unloaded such as a tetrode or pentode, and
work from the observed -3dB point.
The leakage inductance will have little effect on the unloaded response.
The capacitance and leakage inductance will react together to form a
tuned circuit and
low pass filter with an ultimate slope of more than 6dB/octave.
So rapid phase shift increase occurs as F becomes high so it is
important to minimise C and LL
to force the frequency of resonance to be as far as possible above the
audio band and where
the phase shift with loop NFB does not cause oscillations.
Trying to establish an equivalent model of the complex LCR offered by
such a simple OPT as No1
is beyond my abilities and there is little point to achieve such
modelling. It is simply easier to
establish low values of C and LL by empirical methods and then
critically damp the HF gain
of the amp to achieve low overshoot on square waves with a 0.22 uF
across the output without any R load,
while maintaining a maximal HF pole with a solely R load.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
METRIC WINDING WIRE SIZE CHART
The metric winding wire sizes were kindly given to me by a local Sydney
wire and transformer parts supplier.
The original chart contained the same copper sizes as shown for grade 1
with less enamel thickness
and grade 3 with more enamel thickness. I only use grade 2 which is the
only grade shown in the chart below.
Grade 2 is the only grade stocked by my supplier because it is the
industry norm for 99% of high temperature rated winding wire for
electric motors and stressful industrial applications.
The range of sizes shown are not all obtainable off the shelf, and to
get some sizes a wait for an order is involved,
so I sometimes have to design around the wire size available, which
adds to the challenge.
Anyone not used to measuring in millimetres better start getting used
to metric because here the
diameter measurement matters more than the wire guage, and there are is
AWG, SWG, BS, all very confusing,
and I don't have conversion charts so if you work in guages and inches
and feet, provide your own solutions.
Before winding anything, make sure you have an accurate micrometer to
confirm that the size is correct.
